The Epistemology of Climate Change
Philosophy of science perspectives on the climate challenge
Prof. Dr. Vincent Lam
Understanding and modelling climate systems---in particular local ones---in an appropriate way is an extremely difficult task, but science actually quite often faces extremely difficult tasks. The specificity and the importance of climate science is that it is expected to provide scientific and empirical grounds for decision- and policy-making in the face of the climate challenge. This research project aims to carefully investigate and clarify the methodological and epistemic foundations of climate science and climate modelling using the tools of philosophy of science in order to provide the best possible support for addressing the climate challenge, with particular attention to local, regional climate modelling and decision-making at the national level (Switzerland will be taken as a study case). Indeed, mitigation and above all adaptation requires appropriate policy-making at the national level. Moreover, appropriate understanding of the climate-related issues at the local level may enhance public support and adherence to climate policy.
While there is a large consensus about model projections for global trends such as increasing global mean surface temperature under various emissions scenarios, the reliability of more local (and long term) projections is far weaker. But impact assessment and policy-making at the national level typically rely on local, high-resolution climate projections. In many ways, climate modelling and climate decision-making are now at a turning point, facing the tension between, on the one hand, the current focus on more detailed, complex climate models and on increasing computational resources and, on the other hand, possible fundamental epistemic constraints (such as structural instabilities) and uncertainties linked to high-resolution (local, long term) projections.
The project is divided in four strongly interconnected parts. The first part provides a detailed and critical landscape of the main current epistemic issues in contemporary climate science and climate modelling, with a focus on the degree of expert consensus. The second part aims to evaluate to what extent certain structural epistemic features of climate models (such as structural model error) point towards some fundamental epistemic limitation for climate modelling and may require some kind of ‘paradigm’ shift in the epistemology of climate science, where expert judgement may explicitly play a more important role in complement to complex climate model outputs. The third part investigates the nature and the role of scientific understanding and explanation (central to expert judgement) in climate science and climate modelling. The goal is to bring a new perspective on and develop a clear conceptual framework for the explanatory schemes and the relationships between the various (local and global) levels at work in climate science and climate modelling. The fourth part takes regional climate modelling in the Swiss context as a study case.
The Project is funded by Swiss National Science Foundation, SNSF professorships
Fall semester 2019
Seminar Philosophy of science perspectives on the climate challenge
Interdisciplinary meetings devoted to the foundational and conceptual issues in climate science and climate modelling (and more generally linked the climate challenge).
- 04.10.19, 10:15-12:00, Unitobler F004: Introduction
- 11.10.19, 10:15-12:00, Unitobler F004: Discussion of the papers
- Frigg, R. et al. (2014), Laplace’s Demon and the Adventures of His Apprentices, Philosophy of Science 81: 31-59
- Nabergall et al. (2019), An antidote for hawkmoths: on the prevalence of structural chaos in non-linear modeling, European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9:21
- Smith, L. A. (2002), What might we learn from climate forecasts, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 4: 2487-92
- McWilliams, J. C. (2007), Irreducible imprecision in atmospheric and oceanic simulations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 21: 8709-13.
- 17.10.19, 10:15-12:00, Unitobler F001: Talk by Roman Frigg (London School of Economics) We will discuss an unpublished draft, please contact us to get the document.
- 18.10.19, 10:15-12:00, Unitobler F004: Discussion of the papers
- Reichstein et al. (2019), Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science, Nature 566, 195-204.
- Knüsel et al. (2019), Applying big data beyond small problems in climate research, Nature Climate Change 9, 196-202.
- Unpublished draft. Please contact us to get the document.
- 15.11.19, 9:15-12:00, Unitobler F011: Workshop ‘Big data, machine learning, climate modelling & understanding’ with Benedikt Knüsel (ETHZ), Lionel Moret (MeteoSwiss) and Tim Räz (UNIBE).
- 22.11.19, 10:15-12:00, Unitobler F004. Talk by Juan Avella (UNIBE) & discussion of the paper :
- Weaver et al. (2013), Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making, WIREs: Clim Change 4:39-60.
- 29.11.19, 10:15-12:00, Unitobler F004: Talk by Mathias Frisch (Leibniz Universität Hannover)
- 05.12.19, 11:15-13:00, Unitobler F114: Talk by Stefan Brönnimann (UNIBE)
- 13.12.19, 10:15-12:00, Unitobler F004: Talk by Emmanuele Russo (UNIBE) & discussion of the paper:
- Samartin et al. (2017). Warm Mediterranean mid-Holocene summers inferred from fossil midge assemblages. Nature Geosci 10:207–212.
Colloquium: Philosophy of science
with Claus Beisbart
- Every friday, 14:15-16:00, Unitobler F001.
Spring semester 2019
Seminar Philosophical Issues in Modeling Climate Change
with Claus Beisbart and Stefan Brönnimann